While the pundits and big
number crowd have been warning of a GOP sweep in the November elections that would
solidify their lead in the House and maybe claim the Senate, some interesting
results are emerging in the South (Daily
Kos). Incumbent Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is
effectively tied with Alison Lundergan Grimes (D-KY) at 46% - 45%.
Incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas is beating Republican
Congressman Tom Cotton 51% to 41%. And
Georgia Democratic Senatorial Candidate Michelle Nunn is running within 4 points to even against
any of her potential Republican opponents. Ironically, it is the South, where
the Republican message of hate, victimhood and looming socialism has resonated
the loudest. Is it possible the people have finally started to wake up and
realize wedge issues, which are rarely resolved in their favor (or at all, for
that matter), are not the best way to vote as their quality of life declines?
That would obviously be too grand a statement to make. But it certainly hones
in on a truth unspoken by all but the most progressive of mainstream outlets.
That truth is that the people
tend to support a more statist approach to governance, but their wishes are
almost always subjugated to those of the rich. Martin Gilens empirically
demonstrated this unmistakable trend in his 2012 book Affluence
and Influence: Economic Inequality & Political Power in America. In the
book, “Gilens compiles a massive data set of public opinion surveys and
subsequent policy outcomes, and reaches a shocking conclusion: Democracy has a
strong tendency to simply supply the policies favored by the rich. When the
poor, the middle class, and the rich disagree, American democracy largely
ignores the poor and the middle class.”
Going further, he claims in
the book, “The status quo bias is strongest for social welfare issues ... fewer
than one-third of proposed social welfare policy changes that garnered 80
percent support from the public were adopted. Many of these popular but not
adopted policies concern proposed expansion of programs or increases in
regulation (e.g., increasing government support for preschool of college
education or mandating various aspects of health insurance), but some involve
cutting back on existing programs or benefits (e.g., imposing work requirements
on welfare recipients).”
In other words, as the
American Plutocracy continues to grow in wealth and power, the great mass of
people, that Menken had so little faith in, could rise up and demand their
voices be heard. Or they could simply tune in to the latest episode of The Voice and forget their troubles for
an hour … I’m leaning toward B but hoping for a late charge to A.
No comments:
Post a Comment