The third season of a TV show
can be a perilous moment in its attempt to stay relevant and hit the all-important
100 episode threshold, which allows syndication and a long-term revenue stream.
Moonlighting started to go downhill
in the third season, never fully recovering before being cancelled in the
fifth. Cheers had to completely
revamp the show after Diane left for a failed movie career. And there are a
host of other shows that either died in that third season or never fully recovered
from the difficulty of maintaining momentum, particularly if there is a
requited or unrequited love affair between the two main characters (if the
former, how do you replace the erotic and romantic tension, if the latter, how
do you keep people from growing weary of the constant near misses and false
starts).
Two quality shows have
recently embarked on their third season, Homeland
and Scandal, and both appear to
be suffering from the third season curse. With Homeland, the problem is separating the two main characters and
finding a way to restore the tension that made the show so compelling in the
wake of a major, still unexplained terror attack. It seems the show was ripe
for a riveting third season where Saul (Mandy Patinkin) and Carrie (Claire
Danes) pushed to find the real terrorists behind the season two finale and Nicholas
Brody (Damian Lewis) attempted to escape a worldwide search of his capture.
Instead, we are a few episodes in with Carrie spending most of her time in a
mental ward and Nicholas somehow trapped in a Venezuelan criminal network that
has taken over an abandoned high rise. The latter story, played out last week,
felt constructed from a recent New Yorker
story I read without any rhythm or reason beyond showing how brutal the
South American criminals are. The former lacks sufficient suspense to keep it
going. And the general tenor of the show has been so ratcheted down that is
feels almost soporific, with Brody’s once fascinating daughter now a
suicide-attempt-survivor on the run with her boyfriend.
With Scandal, the problem might be the opposite – how to maintain a soap
opera storyline about a high-priced crisis manager and President, who with some
help stole an election and continue an on-again, off-again affair, without
pushing the suspension of disbelief beyond the bounds of reasonable doubt. Maybe
that is too much to ask with a show that has already included the aforementioned
stolen election, an assassination attempt, a shadow government organization
that trains killers and sometimes locks them up in holes in the ground for
months, a President who admits to an extramarital affair among other rather
major peccadilloes several near death experiences and a main character who
would have to do enough cocaine to kill a horse to act and think at the
frenetic pace she maintains throughout most of the first two plus seasons. Scandal has always been a guilty
pleasure for me, found while I was stuck in bed sick a year or so ago, and
then watched ever since in spurts. While the character development is
compelling at times and the constantly rising suspense and numerous subplots
make the show riveting, it is starting to feel like too much this season -- Days of our Lives meets Days of Thunder meets Three Days of the Condor.
Maybe both shows will recover
in time to save themselves, or at least maintain some semblance of quality, but
it is clear that the third season of any show is the moment it marks its
destiny and these two could be moving toward the trash heap that covers most
of the dial or to the trash heap of television history itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment