Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Christie Meets the Sycophantic Sunday Talk Show Hosts

This title sounds like an ideal Abbott and Costello remake for the present age, but what I’m referring to are the softballs that the Sunday talk show hosts gave the recently-victorious Chris Christie this past weekend. I wrote a couple of weeks back about the rather skewed coverage Obamacare and the election received, but this is even worse. Slate’s David Weigel highlighted his treatment in an article on Monday, “Chris Christie Proves Just How Stupid the Sunday Shows Are.” As everyone who pays any attention knows, Christie is emerging as a potential frontrunner to take on Hillary Clinton in the next presidential campaign. I have read laudatory comments from pundits/op ed columnists across the media landscape, including the Washington Post (here), Time (here), New York Times (here) and the Sunday talk show circuit mentioned above. What is fascinating is the tendency to ignore a number of facts: 1. East Coast moderate Republicans have a relatively poor record in recent nationwide elections (and that goes for liberals as well, lest us forget), 2. Christie won reelection partially because of his laudatory response to Sandy Hook and moderate stance on a host of issues, 3. Christie’s record in New Jersey (as I noted in a previous post) is not that great when it comes to jobs, poverty or education, 4. Tacking to the right, as he would have to do, has also been a strategy wrought with problems both in the GOP primaries and certainly in the election (as Romney, among many, has shown) and 5. As a hot head and, well, “large person,” does he really have a shot to win?

But let’s take a look at the questions he received from our most respected television personalities, who seem to have forgotten how to actually critically interview anybody on the right (thanks to Weigel for this list):

David Gregory, Meet the Press
Unless you want to announce on the show this morning, and I suspect you don't, let me ask this question, which is how do you think, even as governor of New Jersey, that you can effect, that you can impact the Republican Party with this re-election?
Mitt Romney told me here last week that you could save the Republican Party. Does it need saving? And are you the guy to save it?
In New Jersey, according to the exit poll there, shows that you would trail Hillary Clinton even in your own state. Do you view that and say that she is formidable, that you'd be an underdog if it were to come to that?
Here's the question. Are you a moderate or are you a conservative? This is how our blog First Read described some of that criticism already coming from the likes of Rand Paul or Marco Rubio. 
The Wall Street Journal, about your economic record, concluded this is an editorial Wednesday as the biggest area of disappointment, failing to improve the state's economy. The state jobless rate is still 8.5 percent, among the 10 highest in the country. 
Do you think Obamacare is doomed? Do you think the Republican Party has an obligation to make it work at this point?

George Stephanopoulos, This Week
When Rand Paul was asked if you're the man to beat in 2016, he called you a moderate. ... He said that it's a tough road for you, is he right? So is he right? Can you play in places like Iowa and South Carolina?
You also said that undocumented students in New Jersey should get in-state tuition rates. Do you think other states should adopt that policy as well?
Do you think that national solution [on immigration] should include both a path to citizenship and that relief on in-state college tuition?
There's also been a lot of questions about the president's health care plan. You called on him to apologize this week. He seemed to take your advice, a couple of days later he did apologize for people who were getting their health plans canceled.
You didn't set up an exchange, but you did accept the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare. And some, again, of your potential rivals like Ted Cruz are going to come after you on that. What's your answer?
A possible run for president brings a whole 'nother level of scrutiny, are you prepared for that?
You saw that Time magazine cover this week. We're going to show it right there. "The elephant in the room." Did that bother you at all or did you think it was clever?

Norah O'Donnel, Face the Nation
You won 66 percent of independents, 51 percent of Hispanic voters. ... Is there a lesson there for the rest of the Republican Party?
Do you believe the Republican Party, Congress, needs to pass an immigration bill in the next 14 months in order to appeal to Hispanic voters?
A lot of Republicans tell me you are already laying the groundwork for a run for president in 2016? What does Mary Pat say about this?
What major policy and political goals do you have for the next year?
[On Obamacare and Obama] This week he apologized to the American people. Do you think that's enough?
You were the one who suggested to President Obama that he do an interview and say, I'm sorry?


We have known for a long time that the media sucks in America and that there is a rightward bias, no matter how loud Fox and its acolytes scream of a “left-wing media conspiracy.” But the cravenness, obsequiousness and inability to fact check or ask piercing questions is rather astounding. Of course, look what happens when you do take on a politician on the grand stage, as Candy Crowley found out in the 2012 Presidential Debate (The Daily Beast). One hopes the media remembers, at some point, that stupidity and objectivity are not the same thing – and that objectivity is an absurd goal to begin with. 

No comments: