Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Zero Dark Thirty ... Brought to You By the CIA

Doing media criticism is always wrought with the most obvious question -- if films are ideological, who is really making them? The easy way around this question is to take a sort of Althusserian approach to ideology, arguing that many simply reproduce the dominant ideas because they themselves grew up with them, or their class position pushes them to offer those perspectives. Sometimes, however, evidence emerges of a more insidious relationship between media and ideology. One obvious example is Fox News, whose CEO is an avid conservative and actively promotes his political agenda. This is also true of News Corp and Rupert Murdoch and arguably a number of other outlets from the Wall Street Journal to Washington Post, New York Times and even MSNBC (from the opposite end of the perspective). But we also know of the politics that have always influenced the purportedly liberal Hollywood. The latest example is an interesting one.

It turns out that Katherine Bigelow and her team took advice from the CIA, who requested a rewrite of parts of the script for the torture advertising Zero Dark Thirty (Guardian). In January of this year, the Senate intelligence committee launched an investigation into whether Bigelow and screenwriter Mark Boal were granted "inappropriate access" to classified CIA material following concern from high-profile members over the film's depiction of torture in the search for bin Laden. The probe was dropped in February after the film earned a single Oscar; for sound editing. However, according to Gawker.com, the CIA did successfully pressure Boal to remove certain scenes from the script, including several that would have cast the agency in a negative light. A memo released under the Freedom of Information Act found that five conference calls were held in late 2011 with staff of the agency's Office of Public Affairs "to help promote an appropriate portrayal of the agency and the Bin Laden operation."

Given that I found the film to largely be an advertisement for torture, though many disagree with me, this a troubling revelation that puts a damaging light on a Hollywood already under pressure for its love affair with eroticizing violence. Apparently, sometimes the ideological chain from the powerful to the audience is more obvious than we could have ever imagined …

No comments: