Peyton Manning is one of the greatest quarterbacks who ever
lived. There is little doubt about that fact. His record in the playoffs and
the sole Super Bowl win, one less than his younger brother, certainly makes it
difficult to put him above Tom Brady, Joe Montana or maybe even Terry Bradshaw,
rarely mentioned in the top pantheon of the position even as he amassed an
incredible four Super Bowl rings, all time. Most would put Aaron Rodgers,
Brady, Luck (at least until Monday night) and Roethlisberger above him in their
ratings of quarterbacks coming into this season and maybe should be putting a
lot more names above him now based on his current performance. Yet he has led
the Broncos to a 2-0 start and recently joined Brett Favre, also in two Super
Bowls with one win, as the only quarterback in history to surpass 70,000 yards.
He has won five league MVPs, between 1998 to 2010 led the Colts to eight
division championships, three AFC championships, and one Super Bowl championship
and then led the Broncos to another Super Bowl two seasons ago with one of the
best offensive performances in the history of the NFL. His five NFL MVPs are a
league record, he won the most valuable player of Super Bowl XLI, has been
named to 14 Pro Bowls, has thirteen 4,000-yard passing seasons and is the
Indianapolis Colts' all-time leader in passing yards (54,828) and touchdown
passes (399). In 2009, he was named the best player in the NFL and Fox Sports,
along with Sports Illustrated, named him the NFL player of the decade for the
2000s. Before the 2013 season had even finished, SI had named him their
Sportsman of the Year.
Yet it is hard to ignore the decline in his performances
dating back to last season, even as we now know a calf injury was partially to
blame for the late season fade. He actually finished with impressive numbers – a
total QBR of 75.1, 4,727 yards, a completion percentage of 66 and 39
touchdowns. But those number declined precipitously in the second half of the
season, particularly after the loss to New England on November 11. Including
that loss, here were his QBR numbers by game for the rest of the season: 49.3
(NE), 66.1 (Oakland), 33.7 (St. Louis), 93.7 (Miami), 52.7 (Kansas City), 34
(Buffalo), 92.1 (San Diego), 29.9 (Cincinnati) and 50.7 (Raiders). Beside two
standout games against Miami and San Diego, those are mediocre to downright bad
numbers. Over that nine game stretch, he threw for under 300 yards five times,
17 TDs and 12 INTs and saw his completion percentage dip below 65 percent five
times (with three games in the 50s). Again, we know about the late season
injury, but the problems started much earlier, really in that loss to his
career nemesis Tom Brady, in a game he threw for 438 yards with two touchdowns
and two costly interceptions. This year things have only gotten worse.
Manning has had four surgeries to repair the neck damage
sustained over his 18 years in the league. He no longer has feeling in his
right hand and it apparently takes him a full fifteen minutes to get out of his
uniform after games. Through two games this year, which he admittedly helped
win, he has the 29th total QBR in the league (41.0), is averaging
just 215.5 yards passing, has a completion rate of just 58.8 percent and has
been sacked seven times. To put those numbers in context, his career numbers
are a QBR of 78.91 (since 2006), 271.8 yards per game, 65.4 percent completion
ratio, and 1.14 sacks a game. His touchdown to interception ratio over the
course of his career is 2.26 (533 versus 236), compared to only three
touchdowns and two interceptions in this young season. His average yards per
attempt is 7.7 for his career, but only 5.1 this season. His highest
quarterback rating (the old number) is third among active players at 97.3
(behind only Rodgers and, take a seat, Tony Romo), and his career rating is
97.3, though only 74.2 this season, with only his rookie rating of 71.2 lower
for a season. And questions about arm strength, which his intelligence and
pinpoint precision have quieted for most of his career, are coming into focus,
as he has only completed 25 percent of his passes thrown over 15 yards – tied
for third worst in the league).
At some level, Manning exemplifies the current debates about
whether Pro Football, and high school and college and even the peewee variety,
are too dangerous to continue in their current form. In two weeks of pro
football, 14 players have already sustained concussions that we know of, and
there might be many others who have failed to be properly diagnosed. A recent
study, reported by Frontline (http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2015/09/researchers-find-brain-damage-in-96-percent-of-former-nfl-players/406462/),
found that 96 percent (87 of 91) of deceased former NFL players had chronic
traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative disease believed to stem from
repetitive brain injury. Including players in high school and college as well,
79 percent showed evidence of CTE (131 of 165 in total). We all know of the
tragic case of ex-San Diego star Junior Seau, who killed himself arguably as a
result of this condition. We also know of Chris Borland (http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/12496480/san-francisco-49ers-linebacker-chris-borland-retires-head-injury-concerns),
the San Francisco 49ers linebacker who quit over fears that the injury and
long-term potential for CTE was too great and walked away from millions of
dollars and what appeared to be a Pro Bowl laden career.
Should Manning quit now, while he still has a chance to pick
up his young twins and enjoy the fruits of his many years of labor (and
shilling products to the American public)? What more does he really have to
accomplish in the game at 39? Can his body really take much more stress and
suffering? These questions are difficult to answer. The clear and solitary
reason one can surmise for Manning continuing to punish his body is to try to
win that elusive second ring and more firmly solidify his place in the
conversation of the greatest ever. That was why he and John Elway hooked up in
the first place and, after a stunning year two seasons back, the gamble seemed
to be paying off, until they met Seattle in the Super Bowl and everything
rather quickly fell apart. Now Elway has brought in his old backup Gary Kubiak
to try to take one more shot at that ring. Is it really worth it? How likely is
it that a quarterback with some of the lowest numbers in the league after two
weeks can continue to win enough close games to get all the way to the Super
Bowl? And what if he does win that second ring? At what cost will that achievement
be garnered?
The narrative of the old star getting one more win to
silence the critics, remind the young whippersnappers to respect their elders anew
and solidify his legacy has always held a certain appeal in the American
imaginary. It defies a culture increasingly addicted to the young, dismissive
of the aging and even of the past. We are the country of reinvention, of second
acts, of long shot hopefuls finding glory on the unlikeliest of stages. We are
a country that loves the underdog, even if that dog is blind and takes 10
minutes to crawl out of his dog bed just to meander over to the bowl for some sustenance.
What does it cost those fading stars to win one more for the Gipper? What does
it cost us to watch players young and old wager their futures for our
entertainment? This is the real question that confronts us not only with Peyton
Manning but with the sport itself. The same questions have been asked of boxing
for several decades now, even broached way back in the Hollywood of the early
1950s. Today, the NFL is a money making machine that continues to be the most
popular sport in America. It serves our blood lust, our dreams of a lost
masculinity, our imaginary communities and our history of violent redeemers of
our greatest heroes. It also appears to serve to destroy the lives of too many
young men, some well compensated others less so. How long can this go on?
Questions
Should Peyton Manning retire now, before it’s too late?
Do the Broncos have any realistic chance of making the Super
Bowl this year?
Should the NFL be doing more to address the clear health
risks associated with the sport in its current form?
Can the sport really last in the long run?
No comments:
Post a Comment