60
Minutes is generally considered part
of the fictitious liberal media. But
if one has watched it critically in the past few years, several stories seem to
fit the more realistic conservative slant that dominates mainstream media. Case
in point is a recent story by Leslie Stahl regarding the Clean Energy Industry
(Daily
Kos). Stahl concluded her piece arguing that, "instead of
breakthroughs, the [cleantech] sector suffered a string of expensive tax-funded
flops." Yet what does she base this on? A few example of venture capital
flops, which are common in venture capital as a market funder that takes risk
the establishment banks are unlikely or unwilling to embrace. The story ignores
the breakthroughs that have actually occurred and the fact that only 3 percent
of the funded projects have failed so far.
This is a common strategy employed by
the right and increasingly the media known as the Hasty Generalization Fallacy. It occurs when specific examples are
used to reject the whole, even if those examples are atypical or uncommon. An
example from a decade ago was when conservatives used the example of the small
family business that would be destroyed by the estate tax. This was a limited
part of the overall pool of those eligible for the tax and could have been
resolved simply by raising its minimum level. Instead it was used to argue that
the federal estate tax was flawed and should thus be eliminated, ballooning the
federal deficit and undermining the notion that each generation should earn
their wealth. It is the same here and an example of irresponsible journalism, a
charge that can often be levied at Stahl, maybe the worst correspondent 60 minutes has ever employed.
No comments:
Post a Comment